1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 75 Ohio
  5. 75 Ohio St.3d 273 (1996)
 

STATE v. WOGENSTAHL

No. 95-1165.

75 Ohio St.3d 273 (1996)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WOGENSTAHL, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and William E. Breyer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Jeffrey A. Wogenstahl, pro se.

Per Curiam.

The determinative question before this court is whether the court of appeals erred in dismissing appellant's application to reopen for lack of jurisdiction. S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(D)(1) states: "After an appeal is perfected from a court of appeals to the Supreme Court, the court of appeals is divested of jurisdiction, except to take action in aid of the appeal, to rule on an application for reconsideration filed with the court of appeals pursuant to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases