1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 75 Ohio
  5. 75 Ohio St.3d 181 (1996)
 

MEIJER, INC. v. MONTGOMERY BD. OF REV.

No. 95-510.

75 Ohio St.3d 181 (1996)

MEIJER, INC., APPELLANT, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 5, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A., Fred Siegel and Annrita S. Johnson; Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn and Michael B. Shapiro, pro hoc vice, for appellant.

Matthias B. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Marcell N. DeZarn, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Montgomery County Board of Revision.

James R. Gorry, for appellee Northmont Board of Education.

Per Curiam.

Meijer asserts the BTA decision was unreasonable and unlawful and must be reversed. Meijer argues initially that the BTA erred by adopting a "value in use" appraisal. Meijer does not define what it means by a value-in-use appraisal. However, "use value" as defined in The Appraisal of Real Estate (American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, 9 Ed.1987) 20, is:

"[T]he value a specific property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases