1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 912 F.Supp.
  5. 912 F.Supp. 1424 (1996)
 

T.Y. BY PETTY v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS SHAWNEE CTY.

Civil Action No. 94-4079-DES.

912 F.Supp. 1424 (1996)

T.Y., a minor, by her next friend, Lynette PETTY, B.A., a minor, by his next friend, P.C., D.S., a minor by his next friends, A.M. and Lynette Petty, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF SHAWNEE; Donald J. Cooper, Chairman, Victor W. Miller, Vice-Chairman, Winifred Kingman, member of the Shawnee County Commission, in their official capacities; Earl Hindman, Director of the Shawnee County Department of Corrections, in his official capacity; Gary Bayens, Administrator of Shawnee County Youth Center, in his official capacity, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF KANSAS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES, and Donna L. Whiteman, the Secretary of Social and Rehabilitation Services, in her official capacity; Board of Education-Unified School District 501, Shawnee County, Kansas, Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

January 17, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry R. Rute, Kansas Legal Services, Inc., Topeka, KS, Claudia J. York, Shughart, Thomson & Kilroy, Kansas City, MO, Charles J. Hyland, Sprint Communications Company L.P., Law Department, Kansas City, MO, Judith A. Jones, Hiawatha, KS, for plaintiffs.

Mark L. Bennett, Jr., Ann L. Hoover, Bennett & Dillon, Topeka, KS, Susana L. Valdovinos, Office of County Counselor, Topeka, KS, Sandra L. Jacquot, Office of the County Counselor, Shawnee County, Kansas, Topeka, KS, for defendants.

Michael George, Kenneth R. Smith, Kansas Department of SRS, Topeka, KS, for Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, Donna L. Whiteman.

John D. Ensley, Arthur E. Palmer, Goodell, Stratton, Edmonds & Palmer, Topeka, KS, for Unified School District 501, Topeka.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs' motion for an order requiring the defendants to show cause why they should not be held in contempt for disobedience of the Settlement Agreement and Consent Decree entered by this court on July 28, 1995 (Doc. 144).

I. BACKGROUND

The plaintiffs filed this action on May 19, 1994, as a class action pursuant to 42...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases