1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 937 F.Supp.
  5. 937 F.Supp. 1355 (1996)
 

HEIL CO. v. HARTFORD ACC. AND INDEM. CO.

No. 95-C-154.

937 F.Supp. 1355 (1996)

The HEIL CO., Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, and The Home Indemnity Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin.

June 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joshua L. Gimbel, Douglas P. Dehler, Michael, Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, WI, William H. Nehrkorn, II, Walther Law Offices, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff.

Thomas R. Schrimpf, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Milwaukee, WI, for defendant Hartford Accident.

Ronald L. Piette, Piette & Jacobson, Milwaukee, WI, for defendant Home Indemnity Co.

DECISION AND ORDER

WARREN, District Judge.

Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the Court holds that the defendants did not have a duty to defend the plaintiff in an earlier patent infringement action brought by a third-party. Therefore, the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.1

I.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases