1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 927 F.Supp.
  5. 927 F.Supp. 1283 (1996)
 

INFORMIX SOFTWARE, INC. v. ORACLE CORP.

C-96-1035 WHO.

927 F.Supp. 1283 (1996)

INFORMIX SOFTWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. ORACLE CORPORATION, a California corporation, and Melita International Corporation, a Georgia corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

May 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ian N. Feinberg, Anthony M. Stiegler, Cathy Ann Bencivengo, Andrew P. Valentine, L. Scott Oliver, Gray, Cary, Ware & Freidenrich, Palo Alto, CA, for plaintiff.

Joel Linzner, Townsend & Townsend & Crew, San Francisco, CA, Brenda G. Woodson, Oracle Corporation, Redwood City, CA, for defendant Oracle.

Joel Linzner, Townsend & Townsend & Crew, San Francisco, CA, Robert A. Enholm, Melita International Corporation, Norcross, GA, for defendant Melita.

OPINION AND ORDER

ORRICK, District Judge.

In this trademark action, plaintiff Informix Software, Inc. ("Informix") sues defendants Oracle Corporation ("Oracle") and Melita International Corporation ("Melita") for declaratory relief, cancellation of trademark, unfair competition, and trade libel. Oracle now moves the Court under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order dismissing the second, third, and fourth claims for failure to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases