1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 910 F.Supp.
  5. 910 F.Supp. 1115 (1996)
 

CAMDEN v. STATE OF MD.

Civil No. PJM 93-1854.

910 F.Supp. 1115 (1996)

Dorothy C. CAMDEN, Plaintiff, v. The STATE OF MARYLAND, et al. Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division.

January 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alvin I. Frederick, Rachel T. McGuckian, Eccleston & Wolf, Baltimore, MD, Joseph B. Chazen, Leslie A. Pladna, Mindy S. Kursban, Meyers, Billingsley, Shipley, Rodbell and Rosenbaum, Riverdale, MD, for plaintiff.

Dawna M. Cobb, Anne L. Donahue, Office of Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for defendants.

OPINION

MESSITTE, District Judge.

I.

The Court holds that a lawyer representing a client in a matter may not, subject to few exceptions, have ex parte contact with the former employee of another party interested in the matter when the lawyer knows or should know that the former employee has been extensively exposed to confidential client information of the other interested party. As a rule, such ex parte contact may occur only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases