1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 922 F.Supp.
  5. 922 F.Supp. 1055 (1996)
 

QUEEN CITY PIZZA, INC. v. DOMINO'S PIZZA, INC.

No. 95-CV-3777.

922 F.Supp. 1055 (1996)

QUEEN CITY PIZZA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. DOMINO'S PIZZA, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

April 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence T. Hoyle, Jr., Richard M. Bernstein, Hoyle, Morris & Kerr, Philadelphia, PA, Sheryl G. Snyder, Barry D. Hunter, Brown, Todd & Heyburn, P.L.L.C., Lexington, KY, for Plaintiffs.

Laurence Z. Shiekman, Thomas E. Zemaitis, Barbara T. Sicalides, Pepper Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, PA, Daniel F. Kolb, Thomas P. Ogden, Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York City, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in this antitrust action are eleven owners and operators of Domino's Pizza franchises located in Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and South Carolina, as well as International Franchise Advisory Council, Inc. ("IFAC"), a Michigan corporation whose members include approximately 40% of the Domino's Pizza franchisees located in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases