1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 674 N.E.2d
  5. 674 N.E.2d 1287 (1996)
 

MATTER OF MATERNOWSKI

Nos. 49S00-9312-DI-1321, 49S00-9312-DI-1322.

674 N.E.2d 1287 (1996)

In the Matter of Andrew C. MATERNOWSKI and Stephen W. Dillon.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

December 13, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen W. Dillon, Andrew C. Maternowsk, Indianapolis, Kevin McGoff, McGoff & Kiefer, Indianapolis, for respondents.

David B. Hughes, Trial Counsel, Indianapolis, for Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Com'n.

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

PER CURIAM.

Criminal defense lawyers with policies against their client's cooperating with the government cannot accept payments from third parties whom they have reason to believe may be accomplices without breaching the duty of loyalty and independence they owe their client.

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission charged each of the respondents with one count of professional misconduct. The allegations emanated from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases