1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 931 F.Supp.
  5. 931 F.Supp. 974 (1996)
 

U.S. v. STATE OF CONN.

No. 3:86CV-00252 (EBB).

931 F.Supp. 974 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

June 19, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Masling, Deval Patrick, Iris Goldschmidt, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Special Litigation Section, Civil Rights Division, Washington, D.C., for U.S.

Linsley J. Barbato, James P. Welsh, Attorney General's Office Education/Mental Retardation Dept., Hartford, CT, for defendants State of Conn., William A. O'Neill, Dept. of Mental Retardation, Brian Lensink, Robert Griffith.

RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CIVIL CONTEMPT

ELLEN B. BURNS, Senior District Judge.

The Plaintiff United States of America has moved the court to declare the Defendant State of Connecticut officials in contempt of the Consent Decree dated December 22, 1986, and the Court Orders dated April 24, 1990 and December 9, 1991, respectively. For the reasons discussed below, the Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases