1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 921 P.2d
  5. 921 P.2d 982 (1996)
 

ULRICH v. SENIOR AND DISABLED SERVICES

4-0312-AZ0603; CA A86249.

921 P.2d 982 (1996)

142 Or. App. 290

Dawn C. ULRICH, Petitioner, v. SENIOR AND DISABLED SERVICES DIVISION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Resubmitted June 12, 1996.

Decided July 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Megan E. Glor, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Swanson, Thomas & Coon.

Erika L. Hadlock, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Resubmitted In Banc June 12, 1996.

HASELTON, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of the Senior and Disabled Services Division's (SDSD) denial of her claim for benefits under the Spousal Pay Program. ORS 411.803; OAR 411-30-080. We affirm.

Eligibility for Spousal Pay benefits is circumscribed by one statute and two regulations. ORS 411.803 provides:

"When a married recipient of public assistance provided under ORS chapter 412 or 413 requires in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases