1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 926 F.Supp.
  5. 926 F.Supp. 948 (1996)
 

GEN-PROBE, INC. v. AMOCO CORP., INC.

No. 95-0998J.

926 F.Supp. 948 (1996)

GEN-PROBE, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMOCO CORPORATION, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

April 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary S. Consalvi, Lyon and Lyon, La Jolla, CA, for Gen-Probe Inc.

John H. L'Estrange, Jr., Wright and L'Estrange, San Diego, CA, Charles E. Lipsey, Robert D. Bajefsky, Gerson S. Panitch, Howard W. Levine, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett and Dunner, Washington, DC, for Amoco Corporation, Amoco Technology Company, Gene-Trak Systems, Inc., and Vysis Inc.

Robert Berliner, Robbins, Berliner and Carson, Los Angeles, CA, for Regents of the University of California, Eric Stanbridge, PhD.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE AND CONSOLIDATE DISCOVERY; GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS; GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY

JONES, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On November 17, 1995, Plaintiff Gen-Probe, Inc. ("Gen-Probe") filed an amended complaint naming as Defendants Amoco Corporation ("AC"), Amoco Technology Company ("ATC"), Gene-Trak Systems, Inc. ("Gene-Trak...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases