1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 914 F.Supp.
  5. 914 F.Supp. 945 (1996)
 

DOE v. U.S.

No. 95-CV-0594C.

914 F.Supp. 945 (1996)

Jane DOE and John Doe, her husband, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

February 9, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lipsitz & Ponterio, L.L.C. (John N. Lipstiz, of counsel), Buffalo, New York, for Plaintiffs.

United States Department of Justice, Torts Branch, Civil Rights Division (Charles D. Curran, of counsel), Washington, DC, for Defendant.

CURTIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Jane and John Doe have brought this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. ("FTCA"). The government has moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, maintaining (1) that the plaintiffs' exclusive remedy for their alleged injuries is the Federal Employees' Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq. ("FECA"), and (2) that the United States has not waived its sovereign...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases