1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 103 F.3d
  5. 103 F.3d 82 (1996)
 

U.S. v. DENINNO

No. 96-6113.

103 F.3d 82 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bonard Ray DENINNO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

December 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bonard Ray Deninno, pro se.

Patrick M. Ryan, United States Attorney, M. Jay Farber, Assistant United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BRORBY, EBEL, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Bonard Ray Deninno appeals from an order denying his motion for return of forfeited property. The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma adopted the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo which found the administrative forfeitures of defendant's property procedurally valid. Although we find the record insufficient to hold the administrative forfeitures...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases