1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 949 F.Supp.
  5. 949 F.Supp. 898 (1996)
 

HALTIWANGER v. UNISYS CORP.

Civil Action No. 95-1024 SSH.

949 F.Supp. 898 (1996)

Andrew HALTIWANGER, Plaintiff, v. UNISYS CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

December 18, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bardyl R. Tirana, Washington, DC, Steven J. Philips, Levy, Phillips & Konigsberg, New York City, Marc P. Weingarten, Greitzer & Locks, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff Haltiwanger.

Kevin Michael Murphy, Jan Ellen Simonsen, Carr, Goodson, Lee & Warner, P.C., Washington, DC, Jeffrey L. Chase, Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., New York City, for defendant Unisys Corp.

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant's motion for summary judgment, plaintiff's opposition and defendant's reply. Upon careful consideration of the record, defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted. Although "[f]indings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rules 12 or 56," Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 52(a), the Court nonetheless sets forth its reasoning.

BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases