ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Stanford Greenwood appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of first degree robbery. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
An extended opinion would serve no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.