1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 914 F.Supp.
  5. 914 F.Supp. 893 (1996)
 

BEATTIE v. ACER AMERICAN CORP.

No. 96-CV-0111 (DRH).

914 F.Supp. 893 (1996)

Susan L. BEATTIE, Plaintiff, v. ACER AMERICAN CORPORATION, successor to Acer Technologies Corporation, Litton Industries, Inc., f/k/a Royal McBee Corporation, f/k/a Royal Typewriter Company, Inc., and Konica Business Machines U.S.A., Inc., f/k/a Royal Business Machines, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

February 7, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Levy Phillips & Konigsberg, R.L.L.P. by Steven J. Phillips, New York City for Plaintiff.

Baker & McKenzie by Robert J. Kashtan, New York City for Defendant Acer American Corporation.

Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C. by Jeffrey L. Chase, Maureen Doerner Fogel, New York City for Defendant Konica Business Machines U.S.A., Inc.

Mallow, Konstam & Hager by Gerald M. Mallow, New York City for Defendant Litton Industries, Inc.

APPEARANCES:1

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HURLEY, District Judge.

Presently pending in the above-captioned case are Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings by Acer American Corporation ("Acer"), Litton Industries, Inc. ("Litton") and Konica Business Machines U.S.A., Inc. ("Konica"). Each of these defendants argues that the claims against it asserted by Susan L. Beattie ("Beattie") are time barred by the applicable statute of limitations.2 For...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases