1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 943 F.Supp.
  5. 943 F.Supp. 857 (1996)
 

UNITED DOMINION INDUSTRIES v. COMMERCIAL INTERTECH

No. C2-96-672.

943 F.Supp. 857 (1996)

UNITED DOMINION INDUSTRIES LIMITED, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COMMERCIAL INTERTECH CORP., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

September 13, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas B. Ridgley, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

John W. Edwards II, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Cleveland, Ohio, J. Kevin Cogan and Todd S. Swatsler, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Columbus, Ohio, Marc P. Cherno, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, New York City, for defendant, Commercial Intertech.

Stephen H. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for defendants, State of Ohio, Donna Owens and Thomas Geyer.

OPINION AND ORDER

GRAHAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiff United Dominion Industries Limited ("United Dominion") is a corporation organized under the laws of Canada with its principal place of business in Charlotte, North Carolina. Opus Acquisition Corporation, the other plaintiff, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of United Dominion, which also has its principal place of business in Charlotte, North Carolina, but unlike its parent is organized...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases