1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 922 F.Supp.
  5. 922 F.Supp. 857 (1996)
 

STRATTON v. DEPARTMENT FOR AGING CITY OF NEW YORK

No. 91 Civ. 6623 (SAS).

922 F.Supp. 857 (1996)

Joyce STRATTON, Plaintiff, v. The DEPARTMENT FOR THE AGING FOR the CITY OF NEW YORK, The City of New York and Prema Mathai-Davis, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 12, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey C. Slade, Leventhal Slade & Krantz, New York City, and Mark J. Stratton, New York City, for plaintiff.

Masako Shiono, Susan Hartzell, Assistant Corporation Counsels, Office of The Corporation Counsel, New York City, for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:

After a five day trial in this age discrimination action, the jury returned a verdict for Plaintiff Joyce Stratton. The jury found that age was a determinative factor in Defendants' decision to terminate Plaintiff's employment at the New York City Department for the Aging, and/or their decision not to recall or rehire her. The jury also found that the decision not to rehire Plaintiff was motivated by a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases