1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 954 F.Supp.
  5. 954 F.Supp. 796 (1996)
 

JOY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. FLAKT, INC.

Civil Action No. 89-533-JJF.

954 F.Supp. 796 (1996)

JOY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A/S Niro Atomizer, Plaintiffs, v. FLAKT, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

March 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Collins J. Seitz, Jr., of Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, Delaware; Robert A. Schroeder, Edward G. Poplawski, and Paul D. Tripodi, of Pretty, Schroeder, Brueggemann & Clark, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff Joy Technologies, Inc.

James C. Doub, of Miles & Stockbridge, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff A/S NIRO Atomizer.

Allen M. Terrell, Jr., and Frederick L. Cottrell, III, of Richards Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Delaware; Ronald J. St. Onge, William J. Speranza, and Stephen P. McNamara, of St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens, Stamford, Connecticut, for Defendant Flakt, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FARNAN, Chief Judge.

The court held a bench trial in this matter on the issue of damages and, at the close of the evidence, the parties were given an opportunity to submit post trial briefing. The Court has considered and weighed the evidence adduced at the damages trial and reviewed the post trial submissions. This Memorandum Opinion shall constitute the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases