1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 929 F.Supp.
  5. 929 F.Supp. 792 (1996)
 

EATON CORP. v. MASLYM HOLDING CO.

Civil Action No. 95-5941 (MTB).

929 F.Supp. 792 (1996)

EATON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MASLYM HOLDING COMPANY and Heinemann Electric (Europe) S.A., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

June 28, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ross & Hardies by George B. Gelman, Somerset, New Jersey, for Plaintiff.

Windels, Marx, Davies & Ives by Amanda F. Schechter, New Brunswick, New Jersey, for Defendants.

OPINION

BARRY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the motion of defendants Maslym Holding Company ("Maslym") and Heinemann Electric (Europe) S.A. ("Heinemann Europe") for dismissal of the complaint for lack of in personam jurisdiction or, in the alternative, on the basis of forum non conveniens. The court has reviewed the submissions of the parties without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 78.

I....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases