1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 667 So.2d
  5. 667 So.2d 1002 (1996)
 

MEEKS v. STATE

No. 94-1895.

667 So.2d 1002 (1996)

Vincent Lamont MEEKS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 14, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and GODERICH, JJ.

BARKDULL, Judge.

Vincent Meeks appeals from one first degree murder conviction and two attempted first degree murder convictions.

Meeks first contends that the cumulative effect of several comments made by the prosecutor during closing argument was such that he was denied a fair and impartial trial. We find that the remarks were made either in fair reply to defense counsel's argument or were not so egregious when taken in context

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases