1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 919 F.Supp.
  5. 919 F.Supp. 723 (1996)
 

G.A. MODEFINE S.A. v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY

No. 94 CIV 4646 (CBM).

919 F.Supp. 723 (1996)

G.A. MODEFINE S.A., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 28, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morton Amster, Anthony Lo Cicero, Denise A. Lindenauer, Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, New York City, for Plaintiffs.

Jeffrey M. Kadish, Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, Livingston, NJ, for Defendants MXC, Inc. and Marty Mink [MXC].

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have moved for default judgment against defendants MXC, Inc. and Martin Mink for their failure to file timely, proper opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, the motion for default judgment is granted as against both defendants.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, G.A. Modefine S.A., et al., manufacture men...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases