1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 913 F.Supp.
  5. 913 F.Supp. 702 (1996)
 

U.S. v. DRANSFIELD

No. 93 Cr 0567 (SJ).

913 F.Supp. 702 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, v. John DRANSFIELD and Robert Tucker, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

January 3, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zachary W. Carter, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, by Joel M. Cohen, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Brooklyn, NY, for U.S.

Bythewood and Associates by David Bythewood, Garden City, NY, for Defendant Dransfield.

Murray & McCain by Francis J. Murray, Rockville Centre, NY, for Defendant Tucker.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHNSON, District Judge:

Before the Court are Defendant Robert Tucker's motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to Rule 7(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and Defendants Robert Tucker and John Dransfield's motions to dismiss the indictment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants' motions are denied.

BACKGROUND

On April...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases