1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 927 F.Supp.
  5. 927 F.Supp. 610 (1996)
 

LEE SHUKNECHT & SONS v. P. VIGNERI & SONS, INC.

No. 95-MC-82C.

927 F.Supp. 610 (1996)

LEE SHUKNECHT & SONS, INC., Petitioner, v. P. VIGNERI & SONS, INC., Respondent.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

May 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin LuKacher, Rochester, New York, for Petitioner.

Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber (David S. Teske, of counsel), Buffalo, New York, for Respondent.

DECISION

and

ORDER

CURTIN, District Judge.

Currently before the court is a motion by petitioner Lee Shuknecht and Sons, Inc. ("Shuknecht"), for a order requiring respondent P. Vigneri & Sons, Inc. ("Vigneri"), to show cause why a protective order issued by this court on October 3, 1995, Item 5, should not be rescinded. Item 11. Vigneri has submitted responding papers, Items 14-16, and Shuknecht has filed a reply brief, Item 17.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases