1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 928 S.W.2d
  5. 928 S.W.2d 599 (1996)
 

GLASSCOCK v. FROST NAT. BANK

No. 04-95-00343-CV.

928 S.W.2d 599 (1996)

Gretchen GLASSCOCK, Appellant, v. FROST NATIONAL BANK, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

Rehearing Overruled July 31, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Torres, Jr., Law Office of Peter Torres, Jr., P.C., San Antonio, for appellant.

Arch G. Adams, LeLaurin & Adams, P.C., San Antonio, for appellee.

Before RICKHOFF, HARDBERGER and DUNCAN, JJ.

HARDBERGER, Justice.

The primary issue in this case is whether an amended response to summary judgment filed exactly one week before the hearing was timely filed. Frost National Bank (the "Bank") argues that seven days must elapse between the date of filing the response and the date of the hearing. Glasscock argues that the seven day period may include the hearing date. The Texas Supreme Court answered this question in Sosa v. Central Power & Light,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases