1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 920 P.2d
  5. 920 P.2d 558 (1996)
 

CANFIELD v. YAMHILL COUNTY

95-152; CA A92554.

920 P.2d 558 (1996)

142 Or. App. 12

Michael CANFIELD and Susan Canfield, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents, v. YAMHILL COUNTY, Respondent, and Troy Rech and Allison Laridon, Respondents-Cross-Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 3, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Bridges, Newberg, argued the cause for petitioners—cross-respondents. With him on the briefs was Brown, Tarlow & Berry, P.C.

John C. Pinkstaff argued the cause for respondent.

Elliott C. Cummins, McMinnville, argued the cause for respondents—cross-petitioners. With him on the brief was Cummins, Goodman, Fish & Peterson, P.C.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.

DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Respondents Rech and Laridon (respondents) applied for, and Yamhill County approved, conditional use permits for respondents to operate a boarding kennel and home occupation pet grooming facility. Petitioners appealed to LUBA, asserting numerous challenges to the county's decision. LUBA rejected all but one of petitioners' contentions but remanded on the basis of that contention for the county to make further findings and to determine whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases