FONAR CORP. v. MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC.

No. 93 Civ. 2220.

920 F.Supp. 508 (1996)

FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC., and Robert Domenick, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 27, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence Shiff, Shiff & Tisman, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Lateef Mtima, Coudert Brothers, New York City, for Defendant.


OPINION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

In the instant case the court is asked to rule upon the degree of specificity with which a plaintiff seeking to enforce a copyright for computer software must describe that work. As the following discussion shows, plaintiff has failed to describe its purportedly copyrighted material in such a way that would reveal the substance of the protected work. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth herein, defendants' motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases