1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 912 P.2d
  5. 912 P.2d 425 (1996)
 

HUNT v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT.

Nos. 95-AB-311; CA A87765.

912 P.2d 425 (1996)

139 Or. App. 440

Jayme T. HUNT, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Cascade Fruit Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Tilton, Coos Bay, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Ronald J. Rubino and Oregon Legal Services Corporation.

Stephanie L. Striffler, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Employment Department. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

No appearance by respondent Cascade Fruit Company.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.

LANDAU, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board denying her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. She argues that the Board erred as a matter of law, because its decision was based on an invalid rule. She also argues that, even if the rule is valid, the Board's findings pursuant to that rule are not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm, concluding that the rule that the Board applied is valid and that the Board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases