1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 942 F.Supp.
  5. 942 F.Supp. 388 (1996)
 

NEAL v. HONEYWELL, INC.

No. 93 C 1143.

942 F.Supp. 388 (1996)

Judith A. NEAL, Plaintiff, v. HONEYWELL, INC., and Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

October 3, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Holloway, Michael John Leech, William G. Swindal, Thomas Stanley Malciauskas, Robert Hill Smeltzer, Eric W. Apple, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Chicago, IL, for Judith A. Neal.

James A. Burstein, Timothy F. Haley, Thomas Hill Peckham, Kristin E. Michaels, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Chicago, IL, for Honeywell, Inc.

James A. Burstein, Timothy F. Haley, Thomas Hill Peckham, Kristin E. Michaels, Noah A. Finkel, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Chicago, IL, for Alliant Techsystems, Inc.

Michael D. Monico, Monico, Pavich & Spevack, Chicago, IL, for Janis Frederick.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PLUNKETT, District Judge.

In their second motion for summary judgment in this False Claims Act case, defendants Honeywell, Inc. ("Honeywell"), and Alliant Techsystems, Inc., contend that the evidence supporting plaintiff Judith A. Neal's claim under section 3730(h) of the False Claims Act is insufficient as a matter of law. Because we find that genuine issues of material fact exist, we deny the motion.

Facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases