1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 933 F.Supp.
  5. 933 F.Supp. 390 (1996)
 

WATSON v. DiSABATO

Civil Action No. 93-4437(JCL).

933 F.Supp. 390 (1996)

Hubert WATSON, Plaintiff, v. Mary DiSABATO and Arthur Jones, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

July 10, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert Watson, Marlboro, NJ, Pro Se.

Michael Carlin, Deputy Atty. Gen., Office of the Attorney General of New Jersey, Trenton, NJ, for Defendant.

OPINION

LIFLAND, District Judge.

Defendants, sued in their individual capacities,1 move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, a motion Hubert Watson does not formally oppose. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the defendants' motion in part and deny it in part.

BACKGROUND

The relevant background information is set forth in the Court's Memorandum and Order dated April...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases