ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE v. ILLINOIS COM.

No. 3-95-0898.

669 N.E.2d 628 (1996)

282 Ill. App.3d 672

218 Ill.Dec. 485

ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Citizens Utility Board, AT & T Telecommunications of Illinois, Inc., the People of the State of Illinois, TC Systems-Illinois, the Cable Television and Communications Association of Illinois, Sprint Communications LP, LDDS Worldcom, Inc., and Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. Respondents-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing August 27, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Cottrell, Attorney General's Office-Public Utilities Div., Chicago, for People.

Calvin Manshio, Manshio & Wallace, Chicago, for Cable Television and Communications Association.

Edward Washington II, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Chicago, for MCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Douglas W. Trabaris, MCI Telecommunications, Chicago, for TC Systems-Illinois, Inc.

Dennis K. Muncy, Meyer, Capel, Hirschfeld, Muncy, Jahn & Aldeen, Champaign, for Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.

Susan L. Satter, Citizens Utility Board, Chicago, Wanda Zatopa, Citizens Utility Board, Chicago, for Citizens Utility Board.

Michael W. Ward, John F. Ward, O'Keefe, Ashenden, Lyons & Ward, Chicago, for LDDS Worldcom, Inc.

Maria Arias-Chapleau, AT & T Corp., Chicago, for AT & T Corp.

C. Edward Watson II (argued), Chicago, for AT & T Communications of Illinois, Inc.

Clyde Kurlander, Chicago, for MCI Telecommunications Corporation.


Presiding Justice BRESLIN delivered the opinion of the court:

Illinois Bell Telephone Company (Ameritech) filed the instant petition for appellate review of the Illinois Commerce Commission's (Commission) ruling that certain services it offered to business customers are noncompetitive within the meaning of section 13-502(b) of the Illinois Public Utilities Act (Act), 220 ILCS 5/13-502(b) (West 1994). We hold that the Commission's interpretation of section 13-502(b...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases