JACKSON v. INGERSOLL-RAND CO.

Docket No. A070086.

42 Cal.App.4th 1163 (1996)

50 Cal. Rptr.2d 66

RICHARD HERBERT JACKSON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

February 23, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Coburn & Croft, J. William Newbold, Michael B. Minton, Dudley Von Holt, Wright, Robinson, McCammon, Osthimer & Tatum, Charles E. Osthimer III, Peter B. Logan and Thomas H. Nienow for Defendants and Appellants.

Kazan, McClain, Edises, Simon & Abrams, Steven Kazan and Ellen Lake for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

STRANKMAN, P.J.

Defense counsel was disqualified for communicating with plaintiff's ex-wife, a former plaintiff whose loss of consortium cause of action was dismissed over two years earlier after she separated from plaintiff. The trial court found that defense counsel's communication violated a professional ethics rule proscribing communications with represented parties. (Rules...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases