1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 941 F.Supp.
  5. 941 F.Supp. 233 (1996)
 

MASS. INST. OF TECH. v. MASS. DEPT. OF PUB. UTIL.

Civil Action No. 96-11044-RCL.

941 F.Supp. 233 (1996)

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff, v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, Mary C. Webster, Janet G. Besser, John Howe, Timothy Shevlin, Jr., and Cambridge Electric Light Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

August 27, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan K. Posner, Rubin & Rudman, Boston, MA, Sara D. Schotland, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

H. Reed Witherby, Boston, MA, for Defendants.

Paul F. Denver, Rossman, Rossman & Eschelbacher, Boston, MA, for the American Forest & Paper Institute ("AF & PA").

Paul F. Denver, Rossman, Rossman & Eschelbacher, Boston, MA, for Industrial Consumers, "AMOCO", Atlantic Richfield, Co., Chevron Corporation, Electricity Consumers Resource Council ("ELCON"), American Iron and Steel Institute ("AISI"), Ch mical Manufacturers Association ("CMA"), Council of Industrial Boiler Owners ("CIBO"), the American Forest & Paper Institute ("AF & PA"), Amici.

David S. Rosenzweig, Stephen H. August, Keohane & Keegan, Boston, MA, Joseph M. Oliver, Jr., Amy J. Mauser, Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC, for Cambridge Electric Light Co.

OPINION

LINDSAY, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ("MIT") brings this claim against the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities and certain of its officials (collectively referred to hereinafter as "MDPU") and Cambridge Electric Light Company ("Cambridge Electric"), alleging that the MDPU's approval of Cambridge Electric's stranded cost recovery charges to MIT violates the Public Utility Regulatory Policies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases