1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 944 F.Supp.
  5. 944 F.Supp. 220 (1996)
 

BLACK & DECKER CORP. v. DUNSFORD

No. 95 Civ. 1303 (SAS).

944 F.Supp. 220 (1996)

The BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION and Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Michael DUNSFORD and M.D. Enterprises, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark P. Ladner, Morrison & Foerster, New York City, and Raymond P. Niro, Raymond P. Niro, Jr., Christopher J. Lee, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.

Donald R. Dinan, O'Connor & Hannan, L.L.P., Washington, DC, and James G. Charles, Charles & Charles, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Black & Decker Corporation and Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. ("Black & Decker" or "plaintiff") have moved for summary judgment on Counts I, II and III of their Complaint1 and Counts I, III and IV of Defendants' Counterclaim.2 Black & Decker seeks summary judgment on the ground...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases