1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 949 F.Supp.
  5. 949 F.Supp. 183 (1996)
 

NOBLE v. GREAT BRANDS OF EUROPE, INC.

No. 96 Civ. 3809 (SAS).

949 F.Supp. 183 (1996)

Richard NOBLE, Plaintiff, v. GREAT BRANDS OF EUROPE, INC., TBWA Chiat/Day, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 17, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen A. Weingrad, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Gregory W. Herbert, Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke L.L.P., New York City, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Defendants Great Brands of Europe, Inc. ("Great Brands") and TBWA Chiat/Day ("TBWA") (together, "Defendants") move to dismiss Plaintiff Richard Noble's ("Noble") Complaint1 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6). For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases