1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 930 F.Supp.
  5. 930 F.Supp. 202 (1996)
 

DOLLA v. UNICAST CO.

No. 96-CV-2809.

930 F.Supp. 202 (1996)

Stephen DOLLA, Plaintiff, v. UNICAST COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

June 26, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles W. Campbell, Norristown, PA, for Plaintiff.

Theodore J. Zeller, III, Allentown, PA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

I

Defendant Unicast Company ("Unicast") seeks an order dismissing three of the five claims contained in Plaintiff Stephen Dolla's complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). A Rule 12(b)(6) motion is the proper means by which a defendant challenges the legal sufficiency of a complaint. Jones v. Hinton, 847 F.Supp. 41, 42 (E.D.Pa.1994). To defeat the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases