1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 915 F.Supp.
  5. 915 F.Supp. 176 (1996)
 

BRENIZER v. RAY

No. CV 95-3761-RSWL.

915 F.Supp. 176 (1996)

Charles A. BRENIZER, Plaintiff, v. Ryder RAY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

January 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles A Brenizer, Nipomo, CA, pro se.

David Jay Ozeran, La Follette Johnson De Haas Fesler & Ames, Los Angeles, CA, for Ryder Ray, Doug Jones, David Manriguez, Nipomo Community Services Dist.

Don A. Ernst, Ernst & Mattison, San Luis Obispo, CA, for Warren Hoag, San Luis Obispo County, Christopher Milne, Jim Granflaten, Pat Beth, Kami Grifith, Mike Doherty, Alex Hines, Larry Flagg, Local Agency Formation, Paul Hood, Susan Ostrov.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

LEW, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, as well as the objections filed by plaintiff on January 12, 1996, and the Reply to Objections filed by certain defendants on January 18, 1996, and has made a de novo determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases