1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 945 F.Supp.
  5. 945 F.Supp. 90 (1996)
 

BEEKMANS v. J.P. MORGAN & CO.

No. 96 Civ. 1768 (SWK).

945 F.Supp. 90 (1996)

Anthony BEEKMANS, Plaintiff, v. J.P. MORGAN & CO., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 19, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Grossman, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Davis Polk & Wardwell by Lewis B. Kaden, Arnon D. Siegel, Ronnie Abrams, New York City, for Defendant.

ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

In this defamation action, defendant J.P. Morgan & Co. ("J.P. Morgan") moves to dismiss the complaint on forum non conveniens grounds, claiming that the Netherlands, where most of the witnesses are located, much of the activity took place and plaintiff is domiciled, is a more appropriate forum to hear plaintiff's claims. Plaintiff Anthony Beekmans ("Beekmans") opposes the motion and cross-moves that the Court make its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases