1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 925 P.2d
  5. 925 P.2d 107 (1996)
 

LAKIN v. SENCO PRODUCTS, INC.

9211-07901; CA A83575.

925 P.2d 107 (1996)

144 Or. App. 52

John LAKIN and Ann Marie Lakin, husband and wife, Respondents—Cross-Appellants, v. SENCO PRODUCTS, INC., an Ohio corporation, Appellant—Cross-Respondent, and Western Supply Corporation, an Oregon corporation, dba Western Tool Supply, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 9, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Hallmark and Lindsey H. Hughes, argued the cause for appellant— cross-respondent. With them on the briefs was Hallmark, Keating & Abbott, P.C.

Kathryn H. Clarke and William A. Gaylord, Portland, argued the cause for respondents—cross-appellants. With them on the briefs were Maureen Leonard, Portland and Larry Dawson, West Linn.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.

HASELTON, Judge.

Defendant Senco Products, Inc. appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiffs John and Ann Marie Lakin compensatory and punitive damages, following a jury trial on product liability and loss of consortium claims. Those claims arose from an incident in which John Lakin was severely injured while using a nail gun that defendant manufactured and sold. Defendant raises 17 assignments of error pertaining, inter alia, to the trial court's denial of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases