1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 886 F.Supp.
  5. 886 F.Supp. 94 (1995)
 

ANDERSON v. LOCAL 201 REINFORCING RODMEN

Civ. A. No. 95-706 (CRR).

886 F.Supp. 94 (1995)

James E. ANDERSON, Jr., Plaintiff, v. LOCAL 201 REINFORCING RODMEN, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 18, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Anderson, pro se.

Sally M. Tedrow and Ellen O. Boardman, of O'Donoghue & O'Donoghue, Washington, DC, for defendant.

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

Before the Court in the above-captioned case is the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment. Upon careful consideration of the parties' pleadings, the entire record herein, and the law applicable thereto, the Court shall GRANT the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant is a local union which represents construction workers known as "rodmen" who install steel rods...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases