1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 888 P.2d
  5. 888 P.2d 74 (1995)
 

TRI-MET v. CITY OF BEAVERTON

LUBA Nos. 94-002, 94-003; CA A85991.

888 P.2d 74 (1995)

132 Or.App. 253

TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. CITY OF BEAVERTON and Henry Kane, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 4, 1995.

Review Denied March 21, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark J. Greenfield and Gregory S. Hathaway, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the briefs were Timothy R. Volpert and Davis Wright Tremaine.

Mark Pilliod, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent City of Beaverton.

Respondent Henry Kane filed the brief pro se.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and HASELTON, JJ.

DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District (Tri-Met) seeks review of LUBA's order affirming one and remanding a second decision by the City of Beaverton, which imposed conditions on the city's design review approval of two segments of the Westside Corridor light rail project.

In April, 1991, Tri-Met adopted a final order pursuant to Oregon Laws 1991, chapter 3 (Senate Bill 573). The parties and LUBA refer to that order as the land...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases