1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 906 F.Supp.
  5. 906 F.Supp. 39 (1995)
 

U.S. v. STOLLER

Crim. A. No. 94-10103.

906 F.Supp. 39 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America v. Robert S. STOLLER, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

October 27, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Egbert, MaryEllen Kelleher, Law Office of Richard Egbert, Boston, MA, for Robert S. Stoller.

Mark D. Seltzer, Department of Justice, New England Bank Fraud Task Force, Boston, MA, Anita S. Lichtblau, Michael Dee, New England Bank Fraud Task Force, Boston, MA, for U.S.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

The defendant, Robert S. Stoller ("Stoller"), brought a motion to dismiss the indictment against him, asserting that his prosecution in this case violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment because he has previously been punished for the same conduct as is alleged in the indictment. While the defendant's argument is by no means frivolous, the Court denied his motion. This memorandum explains...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases