1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 888 F.Supp.
  5. 888 F.Supp. 56 (1995)
 

GRIMM v. PLASMA PROCESSING CORP.

Civ. A. No. 6:95-0023.

888 F.Supp. 56 (1995)

Dan GRIMM, Plaintiff, v. PLASMA PROCESSING CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Parkersburg Division.

June 7, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick S. Cassidy, Cassidy, Myers, Cogan & Voegelin, L.C., Wheeling, WV, Robert C. Hicks, Rohrig & Hicks, Middlebourne, WV, for plaintiff.

Richard A. Hayhurst, Parkersburg, WV, Richard J. Antonelli, Christine J. Wichers, Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corp., Pittsburgh, PA, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending are the Plaintiff's motion to remand and motion to amend the complaint. In his motion to remand, the Plaintiff contends this Court lacks jurisdiction over this dispute because the parties lack diversity. The motions have been briefed and are ripe for adjudication. For the following reasons, the Plaintiff's motion to remand is GRANTED and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases