1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 922 F.Supp.
  5. 922 F.Supp. 15 (1995)
 

SHAH v. UPJOHN CO.

No. 1:94-cv-783.

922 F.Supp. 15 (1995)

Jyoti SHAH, Plaintiff, v. The UPJOHN COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

October 25, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Paul Janes, Gruel, Mills, Nims & Pylman, Grand Rapids, MI, Richard J. Howard, Dietrich, Zody, Howard & Vander Roest, Kalamazoo, MI, for plaintiff.

Craig H. Lubben, Miller, Johnson, Snell & Cummiskey, Kalamazoo, MI, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MILES, Senior District Judge.

In this action filed under the Americans With Disabilities Act ("ADA"), plaintiff Jyoti Shah alleges that defendant The Upjohn Company ("Upjohn") violated that statute by failing to accommodate her through reassignment and by ultimately firing her from her employment as a research biochemist because — she alleges — she became allergic to her job...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases