1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 888 F.Supp.
  5. 888 F.Supp. 44 (1995)
 

G.A. MODEFINE v. BURLINGTON COAT FACT. WAREHOUSE

Nos. 94 Civ. 4646 (CBM), 94 Civ. 4813 (CBM), 94 Civ. 5032 (CBM), 94 Civ. 6836 (CBM) and 94 Civ. 5034 (CBM).

888 F.Supp. 44 (1995)

G.A. MODEFINE S.A., Giorgio, Armani Fashion Corporation, and Giorgio Armani Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORP., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 20, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, Anthony F. Lo Cicero, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Halperin & Halperin, P.C., Steven T. Halperin and Lisa Reingold, New York City, for defendants Henlar Intern., Inc. and Lawrence B. Schwartz.

OPINION ON DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR A JURY TRIAL

MOTLEY, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

I. Background

This case arises under the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq. (1994), and the New York common law doctrine of unfair competition. Plaintiffs are several corporations associated with designer Giorgio Armani. Plaintiffs have placed Defendants in three categories: (1) the retailer defendants; (2) the broker...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases