1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 279 N.J.
  5. 279 N.J. Super. 652 (1995)
 

PREVRATIL v. MOHR

279 N.J. Super. 652 (1995)

653 A.2d 1190

JOSEPH PREVRATIL AND LISA PREVRATIL, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GEORGE MOHR AND RICH HILL TRANSPORTATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 27, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric G. Kahn argued the cause for appellants (Javerbaum, Wurgaft & Hicks, attorneys; Kenneth S. Javerbaum, of counsel, and Mr. Javerbaum and Mr. Kahn, on the brief).

Modestino Carbone argued the cause for respondents (McDonald, Nathan & Carbone, attorneys; N. Nicholas Hendershot, on the brief).

Before Judges LANDAU, CONLEY and NEWMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LANDAU, J.A.D.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs Joseph Prevratil and his wife Lisa from an adverse judgment entered following a summary judgment motion instituted by defendants George Mohr and Rich Hill Transportation in plaintiffs' suit to recover personal injury damages alleged to arise from a three-vehicle accident on March 2, 1989. Summary judgment was rendered for defendants under the entire controversy doctrine after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases