1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 878 F.Supp.
  5. 878 F.Supp. 43 (1995)
 

ESTENICH v. HEENAN

Civ. A. No. 94-5688.

878 F.Supp. 43 (1995)

Lawrence ESTENICH, Plaintiff, v. Robert HEENAN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

March 3, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elliot B. Platt, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff.

Samuel L. Spear, Philadelphia, PA, for defendants.

ORDER & MEMORANDUM

KATZ, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 1995, upon consideration of defendants' Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law Or, In The Alternative, For A New Trial and plaintiff's response, it is hereby ORDERED that defendants' Motion is DENIED.

Plaintiff Estenich brought this action pursuant to Section 102 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (the "LMRDA...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases