1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 903 F.Supp.
  5. 903 F.Supp. 8 (1995)
 

HONIGSBAUM v. LEHMAN

Civ. A. No. 94-1802 (JR).

903 F.Supp. 8 (1995)

Richard F. HONIGSBAUM, Plaintiff, v. Bruce A. LEHMAN, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

October 13, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin B. Pavane, Carol E. Rozek, Cohen, Pontani, Lieberman & Pavane, New York City, Mindy L. Klasky, and David L. Kelleher, Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin & Kahn, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Nancy J. Linck, Albin F. Drost, Scott A. Chambers, and Joseph G. Piccolo, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Arlington, VA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM

ROBERTSON, District Judge.

The question presented by this case is whether the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks was required to waive the provisions of a Patent and Trademark Office regulation establishing rules for proving that a patent application was timely filed, where the application never reached the Patent and Trademark Office and the applicant is unable to produce an Express Mail receipt. The matter is before me on cross motions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases