1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 888 F.Supp.
  5. 888 F.Supp. 6 (1995)
 

ABTOX, INC. v. EXITRON CORP.

Civ. A. Nos. 94-10503-MEL, 94-10927-MEL, 94-11937-MEL.

888 F.Supp. 6 (1995)

ABTOX, INC., Plaintiff, v. EXITRON CORPORATION and Adir Jacob, Defendants. MDT, INC., Plaintiff, v. ABTOX, INC., Defendant. ABTOX, INC., Plaintiff, v. MDT CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

May 17, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David K. Wanger, William F. Lee, Hale & Dorr, Boston, MA, Ronald L. Wanke, Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, William L. Anthony, Jr., Noemi C. Espinosa, Robert Deberardine, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, Palo Alto, CA, for Abtox, Inc.

John A. Lahive, Jr., Lahive & Cockfield, Boston, MA, for MDT, Inc., Exitron Corp.

Ralph A. Loren, John A. Lahive, Jr., Edward J. Kelly, Lahive & Cockfield, Boston, MA, Keith V. Rockey, Kathleen Ann Lyons, Rockey, Rifkin and Ryther, Chicago, IL, for MDT Corp.

LASKER, District Judge.

MDT Corporation, Exitron Corporation and Adir Jacob (collectively, "MDT") move for summary judgment on Abtox's claim that MDT has infringed Abtox's U.S. Patent 4,321,232 (the "'232 Patent"). The '232 Patent describes a plasma sterilization device which Abtox currently manufactures and sells. MDT owns several patents, including U.S. Patents 4,917,586, 4,931,261 and 4,801,427 (respectively, the "'586...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases