1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 65 F.3d
  5. 65 F.3d 801 (1995)
 

ARREOLA v. MANGAONG

No. 94-56102.

65 F.3d 801 (1995)

Rafael ARREOLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.O. MANGAONG, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 13, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rafael Arreola, pro se, Imperial, CA, for plaintiff-appellant.

Sara Turner, Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for defendant-appellee.

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Arreola, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for M.O. Mangaong, M.D. ("Dr. Mangaong"). We are compelled by Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir.1988), to vacate and remand because the district court did not advise Arreola, a pro se prisoner litigant, of the requirements of the summary judgment rule, Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Although Dr. Mangaong argues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases